"RHODE ISLANDERS SHOULD BE CONCERNED THAT THE SHIFT FROM PUBLIC TO CORPORATE CONTROL IGNORES UNIQUE LOCAL CONTEXTS AND EDUCATOR EXPERTISE, LEADS TO INCREASED SURVEILLANCE AND EXTERNAL CONTROLS, AND POSITIONS STUDENTS AND TEACHERS AS MERE DATA"
"...POSITIVE SCHOOL CLIMATE IS ASSOCIATED WITH AND/OR PREDICTIVE OF ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT, SCHOOL SUCCESS, EFFECTIVE VIOLENCE PREVENTION, STUDENTS' HEALTHY DEVELOPMENT, AND TEACHER RETENTION"
Rhode Island Teachers Respond to PARCC: A White Paper
By: Janet D. Johnson and Brittany A. Richer
"No PARCC,we want freedom; all these standardized tests, we don't need them."
This week’s reading was a study
about Rhode Island’s K-12 public school assessment known as the Partnership for
Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC), which is an exam by
Pearson. “These high quality K–12
assessments in Mathematics and English Language Arts/Literacy give teachers,
schools, students, and parents better information whether students are on track
in their learning and for success after high school, and tools to help teachers
customize learning to meet student needs.” I’m really glad that this study was brought into our classroom because I did
not go to RI public schools nor am I teacher, which led me to many questions in
regards to PARCC. I had not heard of this exam until we began discussing it in
class and had only limited knowledge of the NECAP (The New England Common Assessment
Program), which led me to do a little research into PARCC. I listed a few of
them below and a video at the top of this blog. Johnson and Richer’s study
examined the negative impact that PARCC is having on our Rhode Island schools,
teacher, and students.
I was aware of the negative impact
that these standardized test have on students but the numbers the Johnson and
Richer’s study provided were mind blowing. First, I want to talk some of the
numbers that this study provided.
- 83% of the studies teachers believe the climate of their school worsened (p 15 )
- 80% of the teachers believed the text experience was negatively impacting their students (p 5)
- “91% of urban teachers disagreed or strongly disagreed with the statement that “My students feel the did well on the PARCC test” (p 7)
- “95% of them [teachers] disagreed or strongly disagreed with the statement that their ELLs understood most of the questions on the test” (p 8)
I feel as if it’s important to
discuss the “elephant in the room”, which in my mind is the fact that this
study showed that “teachers in suburban schools reported having the most
positive experience” (6). This
exam doesn’t only prove those in the culture of power are scoring better and
having a more positive experience with the test but it is emotionally and
academically breaking down Rhode Islands oppressed students. Thinking back to
Finn, he gave us four classes; executive elite, affluent professional, middle,
and working class. The reason I started thinking about Finn when I read Johnson
and Richer’s study was because of the time that is being taken out of the
curriculum in order to prepare for the PARCC. Sure, I don’t believe a standardized test should take over
and class’s curriculum but it is important to think of how these students are
being educated. The oppressed students, the ELL, students with disabilities on
IEP’s, their curriculum should be based on educating these students and
preparing them for a future, not on passing a standardized test.
“Privilege exists when one group
has something of value that is denied to others simply because of the groups
they belong to” (Johnson, 23). I
was unaware that PARCC was offered in both English as well as Spanish, however
as stated in Johnson and Richer’s study, “there are 84 additional languages
being spoken in Rhode Island public schools”(8). How can we empower students when they feel that there is no
way the can do well on the standardized test that their teacher is required to
spend the majority of his/her curriculum pushing on their students? The language along on this exam is giving
those of power and advantage on this exam.
“They must understand the relationship between society,
culture, language, and schooling. They must understand the relationships
between progressive methods, liberating education, and powerful literacy n the
one hand and traditional methods, domesticating education, and functional
literacy on the other” (Finn)
I just can’t see where standardized
tests or more specifically, the PARCC exam proves students have received what
Finn believes (quote above) as a decent education.
"No PARCC,we want freedom; all these standardized tests, we don't need them."
- CHANGE
- PARCC test scores show low proficiency in R.I
- 12 things everyone should know about Rhode Island’s PARCCresults
- Refusal of PARCC Exam Could Impact Schools’ Federal Funding